I recenty posted comments on my moe recent use of LED lighting, in favour of CFLs. The most common concern I hear with CFLs in the use of mercury. Here's an article reiterating the use of CFLs in many instances is still a cost-effective environmentally sound choice -- IN MOST INSTANCES.
here's where they should NOT be used:
http://www.thedailygreen.com/living-green/blogs/recycling-design-technology/cfl-facts
Tuesday, 14 August 2012
Monday, 13 August 2012
Bill C-38 aka Jobs, Growth and Long‐Term Prosperity Act
I don't know how many of you have stopped to read all 400 pages of Bill C-38 and, if you did, fathom the full extent of changes this single piece of legislation makes on numerous other Canadian Acts. My sources tell me that it will eventually result in substantial changes to federal environmental law in Canada. In all, at least 10 other pieces of federal legislation will be amended or repealed, resulting in changes to federal environmental assessment law, fisheries law and the operation of the National Energy Board. It also impacts the Income Tax Act which may have implications for many of Canada's NGO environmental organizations.
Briefly:
* the number and scope of federal environmental assessments will be reduced;
* the level of protection to fisheries has been reduces and is limited to commercial, recreational of Aboriginal fisheries;
* Decisions previously left to the National Energy Board will not be made by federal cabinet and the potential impacts of proposed pipelines on critical habitat of species at risk no longer has to be considered.
The passing of Bill C-38 also results in amendments to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, Parks Canada Agency Act, Canada National Parks Act, Canada National Marine Conservation Act, Coasting Trade Act, Lyoto Protocol Implementation Act, National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy Act, Nuclear Safety and Control Act, Seeds Act and Species at Risk Act.
In other words, the impact of Bill C-38 has broad and far-reaching implications that will affect each and every Canadian at some level.
Want to learn more? Check out the following links:
http://wcel.org/category/keywords/bill-c-38
http://www.nationtalk.ca/modules/news/article.php?storyid=53956
http://www.elc.http://environmentallawcentre.wordpress.com/2012/08/10/an-overview-of-bill-c-38-the-budget-bill-that-transformed-canadas-federal-environmental-laws/
http://www.cpj.ca/en/content/bill-c-38-implementing-environmental-neglect
http://www.fin.gc.ca/n12/12-050-eng.asp
http://openparliament.ca/debates/2012/5/10/dave-mackenzie-1/only/
http://www.afn.ca/index.php/en/news-media/latest-news/Technical-Bulletin-Update-on-Bill-C-38-Jobs-Growth-and-Long-term-Prosp
Briefly:
* the number and scope of federal environmental assessments will be reduced;
* the level of protection to fisheries has been reduces and is limited to commercial, recreational of Aboriginal fisheries;
* Decisions previously left to the National Energy Board will not be made by federal cabinet and the potential impacts of proposed pipelines on critical habitat of species at risk no longer has to be considered.
The passing of Bill C-38 also results in amendments to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, Parks Canada Agency Act, Canada National Parks Act, Canada National Marine Conservation Act, Coasting Trade Act, Lyoto Protocol Implementation Act, National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy Act, Nuclear Safety and Control Act, Seeds Act and Species at Risk Act.
In other words, the impact of Bill C-38 has broad and far-reaching implications that will affect each and every Canadian at some level.
Want to learn more? Check out the following links:
http://wcel.org/category/keywords/bill-c-38
http://www.nationtalk.ca/modules/news/article.php?storyid=53956
http://www.elc.http://environmentallawcentre.wordpress.com/2012/08/10/an-overview-of-bill-c-38-the-budget-bill-that-transformed-canadas-federal-environmental-laws/
http://www.cpj.ca/en/content/bill-c-38-implementing-environmental-neglect
http://www.fin.gc.ca/n12/12-050-eng.asp
http://openparliament.ca/debates/2012/5/10/dave-mackenzie-1/only/
http://www.afn.ca/index.php/en/news-media/latest-news/Technical-Bulletin-Update-on-Bill-C-38-Jobs-Growth-and-Long-term-Prosp
Thursday, 9 August 2012
UPDATE! LED -- You've Come a LONG Way, Baby!
Eartheasy has provided a very useful update which includes a great chart to help you understand how many lumens are required for your replacement lighting based on the various replacement options: http://eartheasy.com/blog/2014/12/how-to-get-started-using-led-lights-in-your-home/?utm_source=Eartheasy+Newsletter+Subscribers&utm_campaign=8fc919ec26-December_Newsletter_201412_3_2014&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_4c37d9d05d-8fc919ec26-310703853&mc_cid=8fc919ec26&mc_eid=317950f2e5
For several years now, I've been using a mix of incandescent, halogen and CFL lighting in my home. Let's face it, they all have their best uses and they all have drawbacks. Incandescent bulbs come in a variety of options -- cool, warm, soft, etc. but they burn bright and aren't very energy efficient. CFL bulbs, while being considerably more efficient, provide a cooler light, are slow to reach full capacity, are usually not dimmable and contain the much dreaded mercury. That means, CFLs require special handling for disposal. While halogen lighting produces the best light for these tired eyes; alas, they are not only expensive, they produce a considerable amount of heat -- great in the winter; not-so-great in the dog days of summer.
Then, along came LED lighting for the home but, as much as I wanted to believe in it, earlier models didn't work out so well for me. Not only was the lighting poor quality -- for the most part, I couldn't even get them to work in my light fixtures. But I have to admit, over the past couple of years, LED lighting has come a long way. So far, in fact, that about half of my lighting needs have been met with LED.
Recently, I replaced about half of my halogen bulbs with LED, and about the same ratio for CFLs and incandescent lighting. The LEDs provide a great spotlight effect but don't produce enough task lighting so I've mixed them in with my regular halogens. LED lighting seems to work best where high intensity task lighting is not required. I'll be monitoring to see whether these bulbs have the lasting power advertised and I'm hoping to see a decrease in my electrical bills very shortly.
Take a look at the comparison chart below. If the cost savings are even remotely close to being accurate in Canada, I see a beach vacation in the near future.
Cost Comparison between LEDs, CFLs and Incandescent light bulbs
Energy
Savings over 50,000 hours, assuming 25 bulbs per
household:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes:
- Cost of electricity will vary. The figures used above are for comparison only, and are not exact. Residential energy costs among the various states range from 28.53 cents (Hawaii) to 6.34 cents (Idaho) per KWH. - The cost per bulb for LEDs may vary. We used the figure of $35.95 (for a 60 watt equivalent LED bulb) as an average among lighting retailers. - Estimates of bulb lifespan are projected, since it would take about 6 years of continuous lighting to test. Some manufacturers claim the new LED bulbs will last up to 25 years under normal household use, but this is not proven. - Bulb breakage and bulb replacement costs have not been factored into this comparison chart. Incandescent bulbs and CFL bulbs are more easily broken than LEDs, which increases their cost of use. - Most LEDs come with a minimum 2-year guarantee. Any defective LED bulb will usually fail within this time. Source: http://eartheasy.com/live_led_bulbs_comparison.html |
Wednesday, 8 August 2012
Walkable Neighbourhoods
Did you know:
- that New York City, with a population of 8,174,290, is the most walkable City in the US? No wonder everybody loves to go there!
- that Red Deer is considered very walkable, with a score of 78?
Health: The average resident of a walkable neighborhood weighs 6-10 pounds less than someone who lives in a sprawling neighborhood.
Cities with good public transit and access to amenities promote happiness.
Environment: 82% of CO2 emissions are from burning fossil fuels. Your feet are zero-pollution transportation machines.
Finances: Cars are the second largest household expense in the U.S.One point of Walk Score is worth up to $3,000 of value for your property.
Communities: Studies show that for every 10 minutes a person spends in a daily car commute, time spent in community activities falls by 10%.
Want to know more? Check out this website: http://www.walkscore.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)